Smith Jones (Solicitors) Ltd: “…I initially instructed Mr Bralsford to provide an expert report on a matter regarding the plumbing of an electric shower unit… The report was promptly received. It was comprehensive and fully explained the technical issues… I was impressed with the report as was the Barrister instructed in the case… I would have no hesitation in using Bralsford Brown again and have recommended them to my colleagues.”
Read the full Smith Jones Reference (pdf)
Lyons Davidsons Solicitors: “…I can confirm that the said Mr Russ Bralsford has conducted expert witness work for Lyon Davidson and the services he provided were professional and of a satisfactory standard.”
Read the full Lyon Davidson Reference (pdf)
Case No: HT-12-169
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION , TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT
Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL, Date: 1st August 2014
Before: MR JUSTICE AKENHEAD
WEATHERFORD GLOBAL PRODUCTS LIMITED (Claimant) and HYDROPATH HOLDINGS LIMITED (Defendant) and CLEARWELL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (Third Party) and MSL OILFIELD SERVICES LIMITED (Fourth Party) and MARTIN CLARK (Fifth Party) and PAOLO LAURETTI (Sixth Party)
Mr Justice Akenhead in his judgement remarked…
“In contradistinction, I found Dr Brown, both in his report and in his oral evidence to be helpful and lucid and logical. In effect his conclusion was that there was nothing in the circuit diagrams which could or should give rise to an inference that they were copied from those upon which the Clearwell Product was based”.
“Overall, Dr Brown’s evidence was to the effect that the circuit diagrams on the Clearwell and Clearwell R products were just “run of the mill” circuit diagrams containing nothing extraordinary or confidential and the fact that they were similar did not mean that one was copied from the other, as he explained in cross-examination. I accept that evidence as it is obviously right, because Dr Brown was convincing and because Dr Ford was unconvincing”.